Michille: Favorite Characters

Marrying WinterborneOne of the reasons that I like reading and writing romance is the character-driven nature of the stories. I like character arc. One of the reasons that I don’t usual watch TV series is the lack of character arc in most of them. If the focus of the show is on, say, solving crimes, like Law and Order or Criminal Minds, I don’t get annoyed with lack of character growth. I do get annoyed when it takes five or six seasons for two people who clearly have spark to get together. I understand why it takes that long, I just don’t like it so I don’t watch it.

I have favorite characters and there are usually the books that I go back and re-read, particularly when I’m struggling with my own character’s arc. What was the character like in the beginning? How was he/she changed at the end? How did the author show the change? I’ve posted some favorite characters before, but here are some new ones:

Helen in Marrying Winterborne by Lisa Kleypas. There are parts of this story that are stupid. They fall under the category of have-an-effing-conversation, but I like her character. She is very shy, but can hold her own with her domineering husband. She has a quiet strength that I find compelling.

Royce in Angels Fall by Nora Roberts. Nora Roberts does a great job with traumatized heroines. Nell in Dance Upon the Air and Caroline in Carnal Innocence are other traumatized heroines that I like. Royce’s arc is a journey pulling her out of post-traumatic stress disorder. She’s a fighter, but she doesn’t think she is. Part of that is due to being gaslighted so that she thinks she still crazy. She gradually overcomes her fears and faces her neuroses by facing them down and coming out on the other side. She usually pats herself on the back when she has done so, which is one of the things I like about her. She doesn’t (always) beat herself up when she has a misstep.

Bailey Wingate in Up Close and Dangerous by Linda Howard. She is another shy one. Or maybe, just a very private person. But when she is thrown into peril, she works very hard to survive and cares for the hero when he is incapacitated. She is resourceful and doesn’t complain. She just buckles down and gets the job done. She doesn’t need someone to rescue her. I love that about her.

I’m going to stray here to an author with a series about a custom bike shop that is a front for a black ops outfit. I’m not going to name the author because I’m going to bash her. So this isn’t about liking a character, but about hating a bunch of them. Because, you see, dear reader, that all of her black operators (former Navy Seals, Army Rangers, Snipers, Hackers, etc) are so freaking inept that they couldn’t save a dog from a kill shelter much less a damsel in distress in Detroit, Alabama, or Malaysia. In the Malaysia story, the hero rescues the heroine from a terrorist camp and they are fleeing through the jungle on foot with the terrorists on their heels. But wait, they are overcome with lust and stop to have sex against a tree and gosh/golly/jeepers, the terrorists catch up to them. ‘nuff said.

Who are some of your favorite characters and why? Or conversely, you most hated characters and why.

4 thoughts on “Michille: Favorite Characters

  1. Sounds like have a soft spot for shy heroines. Similarly, I have a soft spot for socially inept ones. Character arcs where a woman who is awkward around other people but overcomes that put a smile on my face.

    Hmm. I wonder if there’s a place in my demon series for a socially inept heroine? I already have one planned for my Russet Springs (small town contemporary) series. Must cogitate.

    And now I’m intrigued by the idea of having a very shy heroine who arcs to self-confidence. Although there’s actually not much difference in shy/socially inept, I think, other than their initial behavior (timid vs. awkward). Both would arc to self-confidence and an ability to talk to people, particularly strangers.

    You’ve given me things to think about–thanks!.

  2. I’m really bad at character arc, and part of it is because it’s not really on my radar when I read. If the characters are doing interesting things, it doesn’t matter too much to me if they don’t change. I can name quite a few books where there’s barely any arc — Sherlock Holmes, for example, never changes, and Watson doesn’t change a lot (that we can see, and that really affects the story).

    Then again, there are other stories that manage to combine interesting here-and-now things with definite character arcs. Best of all worlds!

Let Us Know What You Think

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s